AVAILABLE SOON: Associative Remote Viewing iPhone and iPad app!!. Take advantage of over 12 years of research and development with the new Time-Machine iPhone and iPad application. This feature-packed app has the same functionality as the Windows and OSX applications we have been using and developing over the last decade. For more information, or to request a beta test version, please send an email to: greg@time-machine.com Features Improve your hit rate by using mult trial consensus Track and graph your success rate Conduct predictions at the most optimal time using the built-in Solar Wind Speed forecast Improve your success rate by taking advantage of our custom target images Both the iPhone and iPad apps have been optimized for the new high resolution displays Training guide included Predict Stocks Futures Sports Casino games Important business questions THE SMALL PRINT: University level research into this inexplicable phenomenon has been ongoing for at least 70 years here in North America. Meta studies (studies of the studies) conducted by statisticians have resulted in effect sizes that are comparable to those reported in some breakthrough medical studies. Our own research has confirmed this with an overall Z score of 5.2 standard deviations from chance expectation (where 1.7 is chance), and we have generated real profits by using our proprietary ARV methodology to predict the outcome of random futures markets (Gold, Oil, Stocks, Cattle, Wheat, etc). While we have found that most people are able to successfully use our ARV method, there is a percentage of the general population who are not able to produce a hit rate over chance expectation. Statistically speaking, even with an average success rate of 70%, one can expect a run of losses of up to 10 incorrect predictions in a row once every 1000 predictions. This can be discouraging, and we have found that most people tend to quit after only a few incorrect predictions. Therefore, we cannot guarantee that you will achieve the same level of success that we have. Read the meta study by Statistician Jessica Utts

From mid 1998 to the end of 2005, I conducted 3389 Associative Remote Viewing trials. Many ARV trials were nested together (from 4 to over 100 trials) to form a consensus with the intention of predicting the outcome of various random future events. In most cases the future event prediction was the outcome of a random futures market during a random time period.

The 3389 trials make up a total of 65 projects (each project is a single attempt to predict the outcome of a random future event resulting from the consensus of the trials nested in that project/prediction). 75.41% of the projects were successful in predicting the outcome of the random event resulting in a z score of 3.97

52.95% of the individual trials were successful in predicting the outcome of a random future event resulting in a z score of 3.55. If confidence scores are used to filter out low confidence trials (the method that was used to filter trials in a project to generate a consensus), then 62.42% of those trials were correct resulting in a z score of 4.4

This report compares remote viewing time and feedback time to solar wind speed and finds a significant increase in the average effect size per trial, and average confidence scores during low solar wind speed conditions. I also compare remote viewing time and feedback time to local sidereal time and find a significant increase in the average confidence score between 5:00 and 6:00 LST during both remote viewing time and feedback time. A very significant increase in average effect size per trial is found when the time difference between remote viewing and feedback is between 2.1 to 3.5 days.

The full report: Associative Remote Viewing - A summary of 3630 ARV trials conducted from 1998 to 2005

.